![]() I wouldn't spend much time with it - these are available for $30 on eBay. Though I think that you may have a focus problem. It wasn't very sharp on my Nikon Ftn, so I am not surprised. To members with experience using prime lenses, especially those with knowledge of older lenses, is this lack of clarity/sharpness/quality the best I can expect from this lens at similar distances?I am using a 1950's vintage NIKKOR-Q 200mm f/4 pri. My question has to do with the quality of the lens. I re-created the shot using a tripod (focusing on the branches) and had the same results. Needless to say I am disappointed with the quality/sharpness of the photo. The camera was handheld but braced against a railing. The photo was shot at aperture priority, f/8, ISO 200, 1/400 sec. The attached photo shows A Bald Eagle photographed atĪpproximately 120 yards. I am using a 1950's vintage NIKKOR-Q 200mm f/4 prime lens designed to be used on a Nikon F full frame camera which was modified for use on a Nikon d750.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |